Rating Sites Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Rating Sites - Essay illustrationSo the reader has to use his own intelligence and judge for himself if the sliping is genuine or false. Pfeiffer concludes that as the traffic to these range cites increase, we will be forced to think of closing the anonymous rating sites. Although the rating sites arouse be poke fund, they can also give us useful schooling. Instead of trying to soused the rating sites, we should do something to make the rating sites more responsible and truthful.According to Pfeiffer, the phenomenal success of sites bid RateMyProfessor.com and RateMyTeacher .com, other rating sites sprang up, which come in different things. There is now a huge network of online forums which rate professionals desire doctors and lawyers, and goods like car repair, plumber service and childcare centers. Even entertainment centers like nightclubs are rated. All the rating can be done anonymously. The public gets enormous amount of information about any service they want. This helps them to choose a lawyer or doctor, or a service provider, which suit them.The sites may be giving genuine information, or just be misleading the users. The critics of the frame say that clients who are angry or dissatisfied can post a malicious gossiper about any person or service. Similarly, bad tempered students can post an ugly explanation on the teacher. Envious colleagues and estranged friends or relatives can post malicious comments. Malicious persons might post comments suggesting malpractice, about a lawyer or doctor. According to Professor Michael Rustad of Suffolk University Law School, who specializes in Internet Law, legion(predicate) of the rating sites are just platforms for getting rid of their strong emotions, for some persons. Rustad further states that they are non random samples of how this professor or lawyer or doctor is doing. On the other hand, the person concern can post excellent comments on himself. Since the sites are anonymous, there is no ac countability.Fraud can be detected and removed Internet entrepreneur Bob Nicholson recognizes the problem of abuse of the sites. Calling the rating cites magnets of abuse, he says that internet users should take the information they get from these sites for what its worth. If there are many another(prenominal) comments coming from the aforesaid(prenominal) Internet address, it points to fraud, where a doctor or lawyer might be generating the comments himself. Similarly, if there are many comments which use similar sentences or phrases, it would mean that the same person is writing the comments in different names. The sites try out such multiple ratings.Online service providers are protected from being dragged into lawsuits over materials posted by third gear parties, by the Federal Communications Decency Act. Most of the rating sites bar only obscene and racist comments, and consent to everything else. The online users are sure of anonymity on the Internet. It is only because o f the anonymity that we have useful sites such as Craigs List and Amazons user feedback. If there is no anonymity for the user, the nature of Internet itself would change. Kurt Opsahl, a staff attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit San Francisco digital rights group, argues that if some people think that they have been misrepresented, they can