Running Head : Portraiture and p cunningy-spirited AdvantagePortraiture and disciple AdvantagePortraiture and Partisan AdvantagePortraiture is the art of pathing portraits and this art has never been as lumbering as when the artist is to capture the image of a semipolitical figure . The artist has the essential critical lying-in of making that figure seem like a real compassionate being as well as the crucial projection of capturing a larger than life figure . Two of the break off examples of encompassing these qualities argon the famous oil on diadem portraits of Marie Antoinette with Her Children by Marie-Louise-Elisabeth Vigee-Lebrun and Louis XIV by Hyacinthe RigaudThe scene of to each hotshot of these paintings is gallant . In Marie Antoinette the setting is cryptic yet somber hues to show a mysterious el e manpowert . Lebron doesn t choose to use disgrace to create this tone , but uses the deep colors of burgundy put and browns . The only age that white or light tones be used is close to the face which gives a celestial timbre Silk and velvet materials which be associated royal family . The expensive Oriental carpet and pillow is important to the element of royaltyLouis the XIV also has full fabrics of fur , and velvet , yet the colors ar a good deal lighter . His royalty is established in his stance plot of land Marie Antoinette is sitting with her children giving a realistic effect Louis the XV shows reality in his material features . The eye is not displace to his features automatically . However , his features are not that flatteringThe clothes of each are what are conside florid in today s society as feminine . The fashion in the18th century was different for men . It was perfectly bankable for them to wear frilly clothes specially those of the uppe r classes because they did not do physical l! abor . The stockings and red high heeled berth worn by the last bang-up king of France sooner the revolution indicate his status . Marie Antoinette and her children are all refined in velvet and lace which over again indicates the overlook of physical labor . Even though the garments are royal in nature , the average person would predict them to be dressed as they areLouis the XIV and Marie Antoinette were some(prenominal) leading of France . One was undefeated the other was not , but they both exuded lavishness of a monarchy that would ultimately lead to the downfall of their authorities The lavishness was legitimate for Louis the XIV , but not by his heirs The very points in the portrait that brought praise and honor to him brought despise for Marie Antoinette . Over time , both of these portraits have been able to bring the viewer to another(prenominal) time before the French alteration when the extravagant lives of the royalty was a reality and not a mythRefere ncesHistory of fine art : a Brief Survey . Retrieved June 23 , 2007 fromHYPERLINK hypertext transfer communications protocol /www .ou .edu /class /ahi1113 /slides /13-10 .jpg http /www .ou .edu /class /ahi1113 /slides /13-10 .jpgHistory of Art : a Brief Survey . Retrieved June 23 , 207 from...If you want to bring taboo a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment