Censorship letter (the bluest eye) :: essays research papers

     I believe in the fact that e veryone has their confess opinion and the in good order for freedom of speech and press. People efficacy produce that I tolerate no opinion or that I dont live what I am talkin about because I am under 18, solely I still stand behind my opinion. The recent contr everywheresy oer the censorship and banning of Toni Morrisons "The Bluest Eye" is simply a group of nation trying to give thier opinion. They got their right and where able to chall(a)enged the accommodate, but atomic number 18 flat taking this too far. I believe this should be eliminated and they should not be able to get their way by threatening their point. The mother who has challenged this book has every right to censor what her child reads. As for other parents they might want their children to read this book. I dont see how this women really sees herself as Bakersfields " enate figure" and takes it among herself to say what other peoples ch ildren may read. Personally I tone of voice as if she count ons me and my peers too stupid to understand the meaning of the book, and not advanced enough to seperate the reality of those 11 "pornographic" lines. Sex, incest, and rape are all things that are real and happen in our world. Many children are clear to these unpleasant realities. I believe that this women is out of touch with her girlfriend if she thinks that her daughter does nott know what these things are. I am very insulted at the fact that she thinks it her barter to take on the responsibility to choose what I can not read. I have two parents already that make fine descisions for me, I dont really need another one. Those 11 lines are said to be pornographic and probably are when taking out of text. Those 11 lines are merely particles of the total piece of literature. I have not merely read "The Bluest Eye," but plan to. This book is said to be very eduactional and a great piece of literature. S hould students really be banned from denotation this book because of 11 lines? If any parent does not want to have their child read a book they have every right to not let them, but this women should have no say over any one elses child except her own. Also I think it very ridiculous of her to carry this on any further than it has already gone.